what future for AI in the industry?

Kite, whose product was an artificial intelligence-based programming assistant, which launched long before GitHub Copilot, has officially shut down. The company points to the fact that developers do not put their hands in their pockets to be able to use such tools as the reason for the halt in development. In addition, a more technical reason filters through Kite’s communication: the state of the art in machine learning remains insufficient for the establishment of a programming assistant capable of reliably synthesizing code. The publication comes at a time when some publishers are announcing that artificial intelligence-based tools are likely to replace traditional coding by 2024.

We have made some progress towards better models for the code, but the problem is voracious in terms of engineering efforts. Building a production tool capable of reliably synthesizing code could cost upwards of $100 million, and no one has tried yet, says the Kite founder.

It is an output that joins that of the software architect Hosk on the question of the management of complexity by programming assistants based on artificial intelligence. He is of the opinion that such development tools are great for building small independent applications, but they struggle to meet complex requirements: Unless the world moves towards simple requirements, low-code software will not replace 80% of all software created. The power of code is to create complex software designed to work exactly the way businesses and systems want it to. It will therefore be difficult to create complex software with many developers working with these tools at the same time.

These are positions that occur in a context where publishers are announcing that artificial intelligence-based programming assistants are likely to replace traditional coding by 2024. This is what emerges from a recent study by Mendix, a publisher of low-code solutions. In the survey figures, 87% of a batch of 556 responding companies, based in the US, UK, Netherlands, France and Germany, plan to accelerate the pace of their software development by relying on low-cost tools. code over the next two years. The trends highlighted come to rekindle the debate on the future of the developer profession. Indeed, who says programming assistants says there is an increasing number of citizen developers, that is to say third parties who are not real IT specialists to the detriment of those who are. This is one aspect on which these tools divide alongside others such as the maintenance of software produced from such tools.

On the question of the future of the developer profession, software architect Hosk believes that the future of application development is hybrid: the skills of developers are not limited to writing code. Developers are professionals with years of experience and best practices designed to create software that is easy to maintain. On the other hand, citizen developers and IT teams should find that low-code software created by citizen developers will be difficult to support, maintain, and extend. This is the reason, according to the software architect, why code review by experienced developers exists.

Source: Kite

And you?

What do you think of no-code, low-code tools and AI-based programming assistants in general? How can they be considered the future of the field of computer programming?

Do you agree that the future of software development is hybrid?

See as well :

80% of technology could be created by non-IT professionals by 2024, thanks to low-code tools, according to Gartner

Forrester: The Use of Low-Code Development Platforms is Gaining Ground in Enterprise Digital Transformation Processes

Global Low-Code Development Technology Market to Grow 23% in 2021, Gartner Forecasts

Microsoft launches Power Fx, a new low-code open-source programming language based on Excel

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *